(COLOMBO, Sri Lanka) — The general who led the army to victory in Sri Lanka's civil war and then was roundly defeated in his bid for the presidency appeared before a court-martial Tuesday on allegations of sedition, the military said.
Military spokesman Major General Prasad Samarasinghe said Sarath Fonseka and his lawyer appeared before a three-member panel for the hearing at the country's navy headquarters.
Samarasinghe said Fonseka faces charges that he prepared the groundwork for his presidential campaign while still in military uniform.
A second charge that Fonseka violated regulations in purchasing military ware will be taken up Wednesday, he said.
The military proceeding against former army chief has been condemned by the opposition and human rights groups, who accuse the government of retaliating against a man who dared challenge President Mahinda Rajapaksa in his re-election bid.
"Sarath Fonseka's arrest continues the Rajapaksa government's postelection crackdown on political opposition," said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific Director.
Police used tear gas and batons to disperse a protest in support of Fonseka and arrested 14 people, according to a member of Fonseka's party, the Democratic National Alliance.
The proceedings against Fonseka were shrouded in secrecy. Reporters were barred from the event, and the military did not release details of the proceedings.
Fonseka's wife, Anoma, said she opted not to attend the hearing because the charges against her husband were "a joke."
Soon after Fonseka's arrest on Feb. 8, government officials went public with various allegations against him including a plot to assassinate Rajapaksa and capture power. But they are not among the official charges.
Fonseka's supporters have denied the charges brought against him, saying the government is punishing the retired general for challenging Rajapaksa and is attempting to cow the opposition before April 8 parliamentary elections.
Police used tear gas to disperse a protest against the court-martial in the town of Panadura, south of the capital, Colombo, according to Democratic National Alliance party member Nalindra Jayatissa.
He said 14 protesters were arrested and two others were hospitalized after being beaten by police.
Police spokesman Prishantha Jayakody said he would not comment until he receives a report from local police.
Rajapaksa and Fonseka were once strong allies in their campaign to defeat the Tamil Tiger rebels and end their 25-year armed campaign for an independent state.
After routing the rebels last May, both were hailed as heroes by the country's Sinhalese majority. But they quickly turned on each other. Fonseka quit the army, challenged Rajapaksa in the Jan. 26 election and lost by 18 percent.
His arrest has raised concerns that Rajapaksa's government is using all the levers of power to quash any opposition to its rule.
Associated Press reporter Bharatha Mallawarachi contributed to this report.
Nampaknya saudara moundweller laju membuat posting. Tak sempat hendak membuat komen terutama tentang AT. Saya tidak pernah membaca tulisannya. Sungguh terkejut atas apa yang dia.
ReplyDeleteApakah sebab2nya ia membuta-tuli sebegitu?
- tidak mendalamai fakta agama dan pensejarahan
- sesat dengan ajaran tertentu
- tekanan jiwa dan hendak membalas dendam
- perasaan amarah maupun setengah gila
- ingin mendapatakan perhatian media blogger
-dll
Saudara lantang tidak setuju dengan AT sambil menyatakan beban dosanya terhadap agama, saya hairan mengapa bersekongkol mengutip derma untuk beliau. Prinsipnya ia bela diri sendiri. Saudara telah mengelirukan diri dan masyarakat. Lepas itu hendak melaknatkan dia pula. Perihatin ada tempatnya.
al-Deen-amin
ReplyDeleteTerima kasih di atas komentar sdr.
1. Saya memang tidak suka cara penulisannya yang kasar itu tetapi saya memahami apa yang hendak disampaikan.
2. Saya tidak menyokong apa yang ditlisnya tentang Raja Johor, juga kerana bahasanya. Tetapi saya faham maksudnya.
3. Saya bukan membelanya tetapi menolongnya. Kalau Ayah Pin dan Pengikutnya yang terang-terang murtad cuba di selamatkan oleh Jabatan Agama Islam Terengganu, adakah saya dan rakan-rakan yang mengenali Aduka cuba menolongnya? Pendirian saya adalah sama dengan Mat Saman Kati (MSK).
Masalah tidak akan selesai dengan kemarahan, sumpah seranah dan maki hamun. Masalah akan selesai dengan mencari punca masalah dan sekiranya selesai di peringkat itu akan selesailah di bahagian akhirnya.
Saya tidak keliru sebenarnya. Antara marah dan menolong adalah dua perkara yang berlainan.
al-Deen-amin
ReplyDeleteBentulan jawapan komen untuk no.3,
Saya bukan membelanya tetapi menolongnya. Kalau Ayah Pin dan Pengikutnya yang terang-terang murtad cuba di selamatkan oleh Jabatan Agama Islam Terengganu, adakah salah saya dan rakan-rakan yang mengenali Aduka cuba menolongnya? Pendirian saya adalah sama dengan Mat Saman Kati (MSK).